GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR0177 #13
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Optics}Aperture Formula

The circular aperture formula (a.k.a. Rayleigh Criterion) is given by \theta = 1.22 \lambda / D. Plug in the given quantities to get that.

(It's a nice formula to memorize, as it's used as common sense in a variety of engineering fields, as well as in remote-sensing, such as satellite-communications.)

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
Comments
kevintah
2015-10-07 05:43:54
Can anyone tell me where the 1.22 comes from? I would memorize the formula with that constant, but I am just interested to know where it comes from.
NervousWreck
2017-03-28 09:21:55
From some accurate integration for a diffraction from a circular aperture
poopterium
2017-10-26 00:47:57
Just in case anyone comes across this....it comes from integrating over a circular aperture in optics. The 1.22 comes from a zero of a first order Bessel\'s function of the first kind. I believe the zero of the function is about 3.9, then dividing it by pi gives you the 1.22.
NEC
grae313
2007-11-01 16:19:02
"that" being 2.5 cm, or choice (B) :) thanks Yosun
ebykl
2008-09-23 21:13:33
I'm confused about units...which unit do we have to use as wavelength, do we need to use nanometer or sth else??
nobel
2008-10-31 04:40:39
use lambda in metres then u get D in metres, use lambda in cms to get D in cms.
1 nanometre is 10^(-7) cm and 10^(-9) m
andrew0387
2009-09-30 21:30:14
1 nm is 10^(-11) cm. I believe nobel meant to say that 100 nm is 10^(-7)m. Then when dividing by the angle in radians, you get 2.44*10^(-2)m, which is 2.44 cm.
Albert
2009-10-27 10:47:29
Sorry andrew0387, you seem to be confused. Nobel is right, 1 nm is 10^(-9)m and it is also 10^(-7)cm....always remember whenever you consider smaller units, the number in the power gets bigger. In this case, -7 is bigger than -9. Therefore, 1 nm is NOT 10^(-11)cm.

You may not check the website, I am writing for everyone.
NEC

Post A Comment!
Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...