GR | # Login | Register
  GR8677 #4
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
Verbatim question for GR8677 #4
Wave Phenomena}Wave Equation

Perhaps this formula is more familiar: y=A\sin(\omega t - k x). But then again, they define the familiar quantities k and \omega for you in theirs...

(A) The amplitude is A. (Recall that the amplitude of y=sin(x) is just 1, not 2.)

(B) How exactly does the argument of \sin make it a traveling wave? Well, a traveling wave keeps the same waveform at all times. Thus, the overall argument has to be constant. \omega t - kx = constant\Rightarrow x \propto - constant +\omega t . This looks like the old high school kinematics equation x=-constant + vt. In fact, it's basically the same thing. That high school equation describes a particle going in the positive x-direction. So does this equation.

(C) Dimensions don't match. Period has units of time, not units of time/meter.

(D) The speed of the wave is v=\lambda/T. From the kinematics explanation explained in (B), the velocity of the wave is obviously v=\frac{\omega}{k}=\frac{2\pi\lambda}{2\pi T}

(E) True. See (D) and (B).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
2013-09-23 20:27:12
the argument looks like a traveling wave sin(wt-kx) where w=1/T, k=1/lamda. Know that vphase=w/k and so w/k=lamda/TAlternate Solution - Unverified
2019-09-17 03:26:45
It was nice of you to provide this timely problem - just what I needed. click hereNEC
2019-08-10 03:09:39
But, to be consistent, I think the and should each lose the power? twoplustwo forumNEC
2019-08-08 12:50:11
Tried get rid of it, too, but it seems that you can\'t edit even your own posts. oh well. carpet cleanerNEC
2019-08-08 05:07:58
Thanks for the information on this. I really enjoy the write-up. tree pruningNEC
2013-09-23 20:27:12
the argument looks like a traveling wave sin(wt-kx) where w=1/T, k=1/lamda. Know that vphase=w/k and so w/k=lamda/TAlternate Solution - Unverified
2009-10-12 08:38:10
I think the explanation for B needs to be spelled out a little better. The wave looks the same in 'some reference frame traveling through space' no matter what time it is. This means you need to find a relationship between x and t such that the argument for sine gives a constant output through all time for the same x' - where x' is not the velocity but the space coordinate in the new moving frame. We need to find a \frac{dx}{dt} such that \frac{d[sin(x')]}{dt}=0. If you want this to be independent of time then that means the argument has to be constant with respect to time. So 2\pi(\frac{t}{T}-\frac{x}{\lambda})=constant=C. Now you can solve for x to get x=(\frac{\lambda t}{T}-\frac{\lambda C}{2 \pi}). Now you have the time dependence for x and you can just take the time derivative to get \frac{dx}{dt}=v=\frac{\lambda}{T}.

I know this is long winded but these little details might be nice for someone that isn't comfortable with shifting.
2009-10-12 10:54:45
That \frac{d[sin(x')]}{dt} should logically be a \frac{d[sin(\frac{2 \pi}{\lambda}x')]}{dt} but it doesn't change the rest of the post at all.
2009-03-19 08:39:59
Or you just know that for a sine wave the velocity is just the wavelength over the period.NEC
2007-09-27 16:29:19
The only variables/constants we can assume the units of are x and t. All others are unspecified, despite what convention suggests.

Thus, the application of dimensional analysis for eliminating answers only works for D.
2007-09-27 16:30:20
Never mind, the units are implicit for the sin argument to be unitless.

Post A Comment!
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...