 GR 8677927796770177 | # Login | Register

GR9277 #85
Problem
 GREPhysics.NET Official Solution Alternate Solutions
\prob{85}
A free electron (rest mass has a total energy of 1.5MeV. Its momentum p in units of MeV/c is about

1. 0.86
2. 1.0
3. 1.4
4. 1.5
5. 2.0

Special Relativity}Momentum

Given a total energy of and the rest mass of the electron to be , one can figure out .

The momentum is given by .

Solve for the velocity from . Thus, the velocity is .

Plugging this into the equation for momentum, one gets , and thus its momentum is about 1.4, as in choice (C).  Alternate Solutions
unoriginal5279
2007-04-11 09:24:43
When short on time (as I always am) I try to avoid calculations whenever possible. If you remember that E= m c + (p c) then you already know that the momentum must be less than the energy, but greater than the difference between the energy and m c . This eliminates all but the correct answer. Andresito
2006-03-29 15:15:31
You could always use the general equation,

E^2 = (p*c)^2 + (m*c^2)^2

Solve for p having E = 3/2, and m*c^2 = 1/2

to obtain 1.4 as in (C).
 Andresito2006-03-29 15:21:28 The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.
 Andresito2006-03-29 15:24:03 The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70. EPdropout
2012-11-08 17:12:29
I used T=p/2m=(-1)mc, after finding =3
=>p=2m*(2/3)E
=>p=2.0 (MeV^2/c^2)
=>p =1.4 MeV/c rrfan
2011-11-06 17:41:09
A useful shortcut on these types of relativity problems:

The solution to is the following: .

Even if you don't memorize this, it is straightforward to derive and is often useful on multiple problems, saving some time on the algebra. dinoco
2010-11-07 07:52:37
You say that "v=2c/3." But since =8/9 then
v should be 2c/3 unoriginal5279
2007-04-11 09:24:43
When short on time (as I always am) I try to avoid calculations whenever possible. If you remember that E= m c + (p c) then you already know that the momentum must be less than the energy, but greater than the difference between the energy and m c . This eliminates all but the correct answer.
 apr20102010-04-08 12:25:33 Remarkable
 thinkexist2012-10-12 09:29:49 This is actually so simple and brilliant I cannot believe I have not thought of this before.
 justin_l2013-10-15 23:50:31 if something is remarkably brilliant, would it not be more surprising that you *do* think of it? Andresito
2006-03-29 15:15:31
You could always use the general equation,

E^2 = (p*c)^2 + (m*c^2)^2

Solve for p having E = 3/2, and m*c^2 = 1/2

to obtain 1.4 as in (C).
 Andresito2006-03-29 15:21:28 The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.
 Andresito2006-03-29 15:24:03 The equation I describe is beter to use since you only ned to take a square root once, and that helps when having larger numbers, see in test 9277 problem 70.
 ramparts2009-08-06 22:54:12 Well, it's better to use in problem 70, but I think it's pretty clear that for this question, the E^2 equation takes a lot less calculation than the "official" answer.
 GREview2009-08-30 19:22:53 It may simplify things to not even think about the 's: Plugging and , we can solve for .
 Albert2009-11-05 00:32:16 Hey, I see what you did there, you used the c's in the denominator of the units right along side the values, smart work. Best solution! You say that "v=2c/3." But since =8/9 then v should be 2c/3     LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex.,$\alpha^2_0$produces . type this... to get...$\int_0^\infty\partial\Rightarrow\ddot{x},\dot{x}\sqrt{z}\langle my \rangle\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}\vec{E}\frac{a}{b}\$