|  
							GR0177 #86
			 | 
			
							
										
			 | 
		   
		  
			
			
					
		
		| 
		
		
			
			
			
		 | 
		 
		
		
			
			  			
			
				| 
				Alternate Solutions				 | 
			 
			
				
				
				| There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one! |   
				 
				 | 
			 			
			 
  			
			
				| 
				Comments				 | 
			 
			
				
				
				Copperknickers 2016-07-08 06:46:05 | Is there a simpler way to figure out the cos(wt), sin(wt) part? Without having to remember any formula by rote, that is? asdfman\'s solutions seems nice. Any alternative ones?
											
											
											asdfasdfasdf 2016-09-07 14:53:11 | 
										     I\'m not sure there\'s a simpler way to figure out the trig part. The only \"memorization\" needed is: (a) what are sin(0) and cos(0)? (b) what is the derivative of sin(wt) or cos(wt)? The question provides the initial condition of the n vector being parallel to the y-axis. When that is the case, there is no magnetic flux through the coil, right? So, when t=0, we should have B=0. sin(0)=0, so we\'ll use sine, not cosine. And you know you need to use some sort of periodic function since it\'s rotating...once it rotates such that the n vector lies parallel to the x-axis, we have the maximum flux possible, right? sin(90)=1, so that confirms that we should use sine.Then, since we get our emf from d(phi)/dt, we need the derivative of sin(wt), which is w*cos(wt).Does that help? [also, sorry if this text gets garbled...I\'m not sure why slashes are being randomly inserted.]
  |  
											 
										  |   |  John Smith 2013-10-17 02:02:09 | I am a foreigner, the time when I solve this question, I can hardly notice that the FUNK MILLIamperes. That will cost me lots of time if it happened in the real test.  |   |  asdfman 2009-11-02 23:47:03 | it says the coil starts at   which means   and therefore a   function. 
 
  must therefore be a cosine. 
 
Do some algebra and you realize that it'll be something like 1.5^2, so it'll have something ~2.25 or 2.5. The only answer that fits the bill is E. |   |  theevilmachines 2009-07-12 17:58:53 | I don't know about you guys, but my 0177 test doesn't have   as an answer choice. Choice E is  . Am I missing something?
											
											
											theevilmachines 2009-08-24 15:31:09 | 
										     Oh it says in milliamperes, not amperes. 
  |  
											 
										  |   |  duckduck_85 2008-11-03 22:20:12 | how do you know that the resistance given in the problem isn't for the entire coil? (so that you needn't take the # of turns into account)
											
											
											elzoido238 2008-11-07 19:17:30 | 
										     The problem states that "...the coil resistance is 9  , which I interpret as the resistance of the entire coil.  Since Yosun found the flux for 1 turn of the coil, you would need to account for the number of turns in the coil by dividing the total resistance by N (if, however one found the flux for the entire coil - i.e.  =NB  sin( t) - one would not need to find the resistance per turn.) 
Thanks Yosun for this kick-ass site! :) 
 
  |  
											 
										  |   |  sblmstyl 2008-10-15 21:39:49 | thanks yosun! |   |  naama99 2006-11-29 21:16:46 | What do you mean by \"one uses Ohm's Law in Faraday's Law"? Can you be more specific about it? It seems to me that you are taking the R given in the question and merely using it as L 
											
											
											Richard 2007-10-29 09:53:54 | 
										     I'm pretty sure she just means, 
take Ohm's law   and substitute the expression for the induced voltage given by Faraday's law: 
  
Of course you need to take into account the number of turns...
  |  
											 
										  |   |  radicaltyro 2006-10-28 21:53:31 | You are missing the   in your final answer. |   |   
				 
				 | 
			 			
			 
			
			
			
		 | 
		 
		 						
			 
			 | 
		   
		 
	 | 
    
	
	
  
    The Sidebar Chatbox... 
	Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... | 
   
  
    | 
		
	 | 
   
 
	
	
	
	
	 |